Poetry and Physics?
Reading poetry provides an odd but interesting way of learning how science is perceived by non-scientists in various cultures, or alternately, how the world is interpreted in personal terms as trained by current popular views of science.
Edna St. Vincent Millay (American, 1892-1950) seems in this poem to have a surprisingly mathematical sense of aesthetics:
Euclid alone has looked on Beauty bare.
Let all who prate of Beauty hold their peace,
And lay them prone upon the earth and cease
To ponder on themselves, the while they stare
At nothing, intricately drawn nowhere
In shapes of shifting lineage; let geese
Gabble and hiss, but heroes seek release
From dusty bondage into luminous air.
O blinding hour, O holy, terrible day,
When first the shaft into his vision shone
Of light anatomized! Euclid alone
Has looked on Beauty bare. Fortunate they
Who, though once only and then but far away,
Have heard her massive sandal set on stone.
In his book The
Copernican revolution; planetary astronomy in the development of Western
thought, T. S. Kuhn mentions a poem by John
Donne, namely "An
Anatomy of the World: the First Anniversary". Donne (1572-1631)
was a contemporary of Galileo. The poem commemorates the anniversary
of the death (in 1610) of the fifteen-year-old daughter Elizabeth of the
poet's friend Sir Robert Drury. As a way of describing the emotional
devastation of her family, Donne describes a general malaise which he attributes
to the increasing popularity of the Copernican world view. See especially
lines 205 to 219. Kuhn gives a very interesting explanation of the
role that "atomic theory" began to play at that time (referred to by Donne
as "atomies".) It is also interesting that apparently more than one
person accused Donne of blasphemy because of this poem. If you read
lines 220 to the end, you will perhaps understand how this could happen,
and perhaps also appreciate more deeply the religious sensitivities of
Europe in the seventeenth century.
It is not clear that Donne personally was upset by Copernican thought.
He used astronomical, optical, and other physical metaphors in much of
his poetry. Notice for example, line 221 of "Anatomy." Another
example is the poem "A
Lecture Upon The Shadow," which describes the hourly progress of a
shadow and uses this as a metaphor for love. A third example is Donne's
poem "The
Ecstasy" which on line 7 describes "eyebeams" as physical emanences
from the eyes, and on line 11 mentions reflected images of each other in
the eyes of the lovers.
Neutrinos: they are
very small
They have no charge;
they have no mass;
they do not interact
at all.
The Earth is just
a silly ball
to them, through which
they simply pass
like dustmaids down
a drafty hall
or photons through
a sheet of glass.
The full poem, originally published in the New Yorker, is found on the
web page <http://www-numi.fnal.gov/public/neutrinophysics.html>.
Well up above the tropostrata
There is a region stark and stellar
Where, on a streak of anti-matter
Lived Dr. Edward Anti-Teller.
Remote from Fusion's origin,
He lived unguessed and unawares
With all his antikith and kin,
And kept macassars1 on his chairs.
One morning, idling by the sea,
He spied a tin of monstrous girth
That bore three letters: A. E. C.2
Out stepped a visitor from Earth.
Then, shouting gladly o'er the sands,
Met two who in their alien ways
Were like as gentils3. Their right hands
Clasped, and the rest was gamma rays.
1. Macassar oil was a popular hair dressing in the 19th
century, named after the Indonesian port where the oil purportedly came
from. An "antimacassar" is the decorative fabric used on chairs or
sofas to protect the upholstery.
2. AEC=Atomic Energy Commission, now replaced by DOE=Department
of Energy. The AEC (like the DOE today) funded most of the National
Laboratories, including Teller's Livermore Laboratory.
3. This is a puzzle I have not been able to solve; however,
I recently learned that an alternate version of the poem uses the word
lentils
in place of gentils. Then there is not really a puzzle.
A lentil is a type of pea and this is a way of saying "like as peas in
a pod."
Incidentally, Edward Teller's recently published
memoir, "Memoirs: A Twentieth-Century Journey in Science and Politics"
was reviewed in the Sunday NY Times Book Review section, Nov. 25, 2001.
The illustration with the review is inspired, I suspect, by this poem.
Harold
P. Furth was director of the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory from
1981 to 1990. The mission of this laboratory is to develop controlled
fusion using "magnetic confinement." Teller's name is intimately
connected with fusion. He is often called "father of the hydrogen
(or fusion) bomb". Teller's associates at the Livermore lab have
been pursuing a rival scheme of controlled fusion which uses "inertial
confinement." This means that the deuterium fuel is held in a compressed
state only during the time that inertia allows before outward acceleration
takes over. The compression is caused by a simultaneous blast from
many focused laser beams.
Furth is the one who asked the key question of Stanley
Pons ("what happens in your experiment if ordinary water is substituted
for heavy water,") at the otherwise adulatory American Chemical Society
meeting in Dallas, April 12, 1989. Edward Teller, on the other hand,
is reported to have said that cold fusion "sounds right." (R. Park, Voodoo
Science, p.26.) Teller has been known for overly optimistic statements
in the past (William Broad, Teller's War, Simon and Schuster, 1992).
Of course, he is not unique in this, but he has been uniquely persuasive
as a result of his personal charm and excellent scientific credentials.